This study examines the social cost of banking industry in Iran (17 governmental and private banks) in an unbalanced panel data model.
To conduct estimations, two different approaches were taken: 1- Welfare Triangle approach 2- Libenstein’s approach. In the former, welfare triangle is measured assuming banking industry operating in full technical efficiency however, the latter includes both the effect of welfare triangle and the cost of likely technical X-inefficiency. The result of the first method showed that the social cost of banks in Iran is little, amounting to be less than 1 percent of GDP in 2008 while within the same period, the second method resulted in 4 percent of GDP, as the social cost of banks in Iran.
shafiee,A , shafiee,A and Tashkini,A . (2026). Measuring Welfare Cost of Banking Industry in Iran: The Approach of Allocative and X-inefficiency. Economic Modeling Research, 1(1), 107-135.
MLA
shafiee,A , , shafiee,A , and Tashkini,A . "Measuring Welfare Cost of Banking Industry in Iran: The Approach of Allocative and X-inefficiency", Economic Modeling Research, 1, 1, 2026, 107-135.
HARVARD
shafiee A, shafiee A, Tashkini A. (2026). 'Measuring Welfare Cost of Banking Industry in Iran: The Approach of Allocative and X-inefficiency', Economic Modeling Research, 1(1), pp. 107-135.
CHICAGO
A shafiee, A shafiee and A Tashkini, "Measuring Welfare Cost of Banking Industry in Iran: The Approach of Allocative and X-inefficiency," Economic Modeling Research, 1 1 (2026): 107-135,
VANCOUVER
shafiee A, shafiee A, Tashkini A. Measuring Welfare Cost of Banking Industry in Iran: The Approach of Allocative and X-inefficiency. Economic Modeling Research. 2026;1(1):107-135 (In Persian).