تأثیر متقابل جهانی شدن و نوآوری بر بهره وری کل عوامل در کشورهای منتخب تولیدکننده علم

نویسندگان
ابوالفضل شاه آبادی
رقیه پوران
پریسا گلی
گروه اقتصاد دانشکده علوم اجتماعی و اقتصادی، دانشگاه الزهرا،
چکیده
بی­ شک یکی از راههای تحقق اقتصاد دانش‌بنیان، ارتقاء بهره‌وری کل عوامل از طریق گسترش فعالیت­های نوآورانه و جذب سرریز دانش نهفته در فناوری‌های وارداتی است. آنچه این فرآیند را تسهیل می‌کند، کیفیت نهادی مناسب و استفاده هدفمند از ظرفیت جهانی شدن در ابعاد مختلف است. در این راستا، پژوهش حاضر با رویکرد داده­های تابلویی و روش گشتاورهای تعمیم ­یافته (GMM) به بررسی تأثیر متقابل جهانی­ شدن و نوآوری بر بهره‌وری کل عوامل در دو گروه از کشورهای منتخب تولیدکننده علم با درآمدسرانه بالای 20 هزار دلار و کشورهای منتخب تولیدکننده علم با درآمدسرانه پایین 20 هزار دلار، طی دوره 2019-2011 پرداخته است. نتایج بیانگر تاثیر مثبت و معنی‌داری اثر متقابل جهانی­ شدن و نوآوری با ضرایب تخمینی متفاوت بر بهره ­وری کل عوامل در هر دو گروه از کشورهای منتخب است. ضرایب تخمینی متغیرهای کنترل مشوق­های اقتصادی و رژیم نهادی و آموزش و توسعه منابع انسانی در هر دو گروه از کشورهای منتخب مثبت و معنی ­دار است، در حالی که ضریب تخمینی متغیر کنترل آزادی اقتصادی در کشورهای با درآمدسرانه بالا، مثبت و در کشورهای با درآمدسرانه پایین، منفی و معنی‌دار است. بنابر یافته‌های پژوهش می‌توان گفت، جهانی‌شدن به خودی خود نمی‌تواند عامل ارتقاء بهره‌وری عوامل محسوب شود. بلکه بهره‌گیری هدفمند از ظرفیت سرمایه‌انسانی در بستر کیفیت نهادی مناسب می‌تواند موجب بهره‌مندی از مزایای مثبت جهانی شدن و آزادی اقتصادی در جهت ارتقاء بهره‌وری کل عوامل شود.
کلیدواژه‌ها
بهره وری کل عوامل
نوآوری
جهانی‌شدن اجتماعی
جهانی‌شدن اقتصادی
جهانی‌شدن سیاسی

عنوان مقاله English

The Interaction of Globalization and Innovation on Total Factors Productivity in Selected Science Producing Countries

نویسندگان English

Abolfazl Shahabadi
Roghaye Pouran
Parisa Goli
Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Social Science, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده English

Undoubtedly, one of the ways to realize the knowledge-based economy is to improve the Total Factors Productivity through the expansion of innovative activities and the absorption of the hidden knowledge in imported technologies. What facilitates this process is the appropriate institutional quality and the targeted use of globalization capacity in different dimensions. In this regard, this research, with the approach of panel data and the Method of Generalized Moments (GMM), investigates the mutual effect of globalization and innovation on the productivity of the total factors in two groups of selected science-producing countries with per capita income above 20 thousand dollars and selected countries Science producer with low per capita income paid $20,000 during 2011-2019 period. The results show that the mutual influence of globalization and innovation have had a positive and significant effect on the productivity of the total factors in both groups of selected countries with different estimated coefficients. The same is the case with the effect of the control variables of economic incentives and institutional regime and training and development of human resources, while control variable of economic freedom has a positive and significant effect on the total factor productivity index in selected science producing countries with high per capita income and in selected science producing countries with low per capita income. According to the findings of the research, it can be said that globalization by itself cannot be considered as a factor in improving the productivity of factors. Rather, the targeted use of human capital capacity in the context of appropriate institutional quality can benefit from the positive benefits of globalization and economic freedom in order to improve the productivity of all factors.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Total Factor Productivity
Innovation
Economic Globalization
Social Globalization
Political Globalization
Abdullahi, D. (2013). Effects of Financial Liberalization on Financial Market Development and Economic Performance of the SSA Region: An Empirical Assessment. Economic Modelling, 30(1), 261-273.
Adler, P.S. & Kwon, S.-W. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. The Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17-40.
AlIsmaily, S., Cervantes, M. & F. McMahon (2019). "Economic Freedom of Arab World: 2019 annual report", International Research Foundation of Oman Fraser Institute.
Antonietti., R. and Franco., C. (2020). From FDI to economic complexity: A panel Granger causality analysis. Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG). Utrecht University. Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning. Group Economic Geography.
Arellano, M. & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58(2): 277-297.
Arellano, M. & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental-variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1): 29-51.
Arellano, M. (2003). modelling optimal instrumental variables for dynamic panel data models, Working Papers, wp2003_0310, CEMFI.
Arrow, K.J. (2000). Observations on social capital. In Social Capital: A Multifaceted Perspective; Dasgupta, P., Seregeldin, I., Eds.; The World Bank: Washington, DC, USA. 3–5.
Beck, R., Di Nino, V. & Stracca, L. (2021). Globalization and the efficiency-equity trade-off. Working Paper Series, No 2546.
Bengoa, M., Román, V.M.-S. & Pérez, P. (2017). Do R&D activities matter for productivity? A regional spatial approach assessing the role of human and social capital. Economic Modelling, 60, 448–461.
Beugelsdijk, S. & Van Schaik, T. (2005). Social capital and growth in European regions: An empirical test. European Journal of Political Economy, 21, 301–324.
Bjørnskov, C. & Méon, P.-G. (2015). The Productivity of Trust. World Development, 70, 317–331.
Bloom, N., Draca, M., & Van Reenen, J. (2008). Trade induced change? The impact of Chinese imports on IT and innovation. https: //pdfs.semanticscholar.org/cdf0/095d749cafdbcb36bc0d177bf940261ea9d0. pdf.
Brown, L.D. & Ashman, D. (1996). Participation, social capital, and intersectoral problem solving: African and Asian cases. World Development, 24, 1467–1479.
Burda, M.C. & Severgnini, B. (2018). Total factor productivity convergence in German states since reunification: Evidence and explanations. Journal of Comparative Economics, 46(1), 192–211.
Coe, D. T., & Helpman, E. (1995). International R&D spillovers. European Economic Review, 39(5).
Cohen, D.J. & Prusak, L. (2001). In good company: How social capital makes organizations work. Harvard Business School Press.
Cohn, T.H. (2008). Global political economy: Theory and practice. 4th edition, New York: Pearson.
Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95–120. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2780243
Del Salinas-Jiménez, M.M. & Salinas-Jiménez, J. (2011). Corruption and total factor productivity: Level or growth effects? Portuguese Economic Journal, 10(2), 109–128.
Dettori, B., Marrocu, E. & Paci, R. (2012). Total factor productivity, intangible assets and spatial dependence in the European Regions. Regional Studies, 46, 1401–1416.
Erken, H., Donselaar, P. & Thurik, R. (2018). Total factor productivity and the role of entrepreneurship. J. Technol. Transf, 43, 1493–1521.
Ernst, H. (2002). Success factors of new product development: A review of the empirical literature. International Journal of Management Reviews, 4(1), 1-40.
Ferrarini, B. & P. Scaramozzino (2016). "Production complexity, adaptability and economic growth", Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 37, 52-61.
Foster, N., Pöschl, J., & Stehrer, S. (2012). Manufacturing Productivity: Effects of Institutions and Service Sector Innovations. The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, 3(1), 1-16.
Fu, Q. (2004). Trust, social capital and organizational effectiveness; Virginia Tech: Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: Social virtues and the creation of prosperity. Free Press: New York, NY, USA.
Fukuyama, F. (1997). Social capital and the modern capitalist economy: Creating a high trust workplace, Stern Bus. Mag. 4, 1–16.
Fukuyama, F. (2001). Social capital, civil society and development. Third World Quarterly, 22(1), 7-20, DOI: 10.1080/713701144
Gazleh, M. A. (2001). Globalization and Politics: The Effects of globalization on human life aspects. In International Conference on Malaysia and Globalization, University of Malaya.‌
Giacinto, V.D. & Nuzzo, G. (2006), Explaining labour productivity differentials across Italian regions: The role of socio-economic structure and factor endowments. Papers in Regional Science, 85(2), 299-320.
Harding, T. and Javorcik, B.S. (2012). Foreign direct investment and export upgrading. Review of Economics and Statistics. 94(4), 964-980.
Holmes, T. J., & Schmitz, J. (2001). A gain from trade from unproductive to productive entrepreneurship. Journal of Monetary Economics, 47. doi: 10.1016/ S0304-3932(01)00044-7.
Hu W, & Yang Y. (2023). Political hierarchy and long-term effects on TFP: Evidence from a provincial elevation in China. Sustainability, 15(8):6363. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086363
Iacovone, L. eonardo, Beata S. Javorcik, Wolfgang Keller, and James Tybout. (2015). Suppliers’ responses to walmart’s invasion in Mexico. Journal of International Economics.95(1), 1-15.
Isaksson, A. (2007). Determinants of total factor productivity: A literature review; UNIDO: Vienna, Austria.
Jalles, J.T. & Tavares, J. (2015). Trade, scale or social capital? Technological progress in poor and rich countries. Journal of International Trade and Economic Development, 24, 767-808.
Jankauskas, V. & Šeputiene, J. (2007). The relation between social capital, governance and economic performance in ˙ Europe. Verslas Teorija ir Praktika, 8, 131–138.
Javorcik, Beata S. (2004). The composition of foreign direct investment and protection of intellectual property rights: Evidence from Transition economies. European Economic Review. 48(1), 39-62.
Kaasa, A. (2009). Effects of different dimensions of social capital on innovative activity: Evidence from Europe at the regional level. Technovation, 29, 218-233.
Kaasa, A. (2016). Social capital, institutional quality and productivity: Evidence from European regions. Economics and Sociology. 9(4), 11-26.
Kale, S. and Rath, B.N. (2018). Does innovation matter for total factor productivity growth in India? Evidence from ARDL bound testing approach. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 13(5), 1311-1329.
Kasych, A., & Vochozka, M. (2019). Globalization processes in the modern world challenging the national economy development. In SHS Web of Conferences (Vol. 65, p. 09002). EDP Sciences.‌
Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2010). The Worldwide Governance Indicators: A Summary of Methodology, Data and Analytical Issues. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 5430, 1-28.
Kijek, T., & Matras-Bolibok, A. (2019). The relationship between TFP and innovation performance: evidence from EU regions. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 14(4), 695-709.
Knack, S. & Keefer, P. (1997). Does social capital have an economic payoff? A cross-country investigation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(4), 1251-1288.
Kneller, R. (2005). Frontier technology, absorptive capacity and distance. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statisitics, 67(1). doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0084.2005 .00107. x.
Kraipornsak, P. (2018). Good governance and economic growth: An investigation of Thailand and Selected Asian Countries. Eurasian Journal of Economics and Finance, 6(1), 93-106.
Kuqi, B., & Gashi, B. (2014). Positive Effects of Globalization.‌
Lalountas, D. A., Manolas, G. A., & Vavouras, I. S. (2011). Corruption, globalization and development: How are these three phenomena related? Journal of Policy Modeling, 33(4), 636-648.
Lee, J. W., & Xuan, Y. (2019). Effects of technology and innovation management and total factor productivity on the economic growth of China. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 6(2), 63-73.
Li, H., & Atuahene-Gima, K. (2001). Product innovation strategy and the performance of new technology ventures in China. Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), 1123-1134.
Lovelace, K., Shapiro, D. L., & Weingart, L. R. (2001). Maximizing cross-functional new product teams' innovativeness and constraint adherence: A conflict communications perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 779-793.
Malik, M. A., Masood, T., & Sheikh, M. A. (2021). Econometric analysis of total factor productivity in India. The Indian Economic Journal, 69(1), 88-104.
Markowska-Przybyła U. (2020). Does social capital matter for total factor productivity? Exploratory evidence from Poland. Sustainability, 12(23): 9978. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12239978
Mefteh, H., Bouhajeb, M. & Smaoui, F. (2016). Higher education, graduate unemployment, poverty and economic growth in Tunisia, 1990-2013. Atlantic Review of Economics, 1(1): 1-22.
Mohanty, S. (2017). Growth Effects of Economic Globalization: A Cross-Country Analysis. The Institute for Social and Economic Change, Bangalore, Working Paper 381.‌
Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. The Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266. https://doi.org/10.2307/259373
Ng, A., Ibrahim, M.H. & Mirakhor, A. (2015). Ethical behavior and trustworthiness in the stock market-growth nexus. Research in International Business and Finance,33, 44-58.
North, D.C. (2016). Institutions and Economic Theory. The American Economist, 61(1), 72-76.
Pan,W., Xie, T., Wang, Z., & Ma, L. (2022). Digital economy: An innovation driver for total factor productivity, Journal of Business Research, 139, 303-311.
Sabatini, F. (2008) Does social capital improve labour productivity in small and medium enterprises? International Journal of Management and Decision Making, 9, 454–480.
Saleem, H., Shahzad, M., Khan, M. B., & Khilji, B. A. (2019). Innovation, total factor productivity and economic growth in Pakistan: a policy perspective. Journal of Economic Structures,8(1): 1-18.
Sözbilir, F. (2018). The interaction between social capital, creativity and efficiency in organisations. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 27, 92-100.
Stiglitz, J. E. (2012). Good Growth and Governance in Africa. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tian, J., & Liu, Y. (2021). Research on total factor productivity measurement and influencing factors of digital economy enterprises. Procedia Computer Science, 187, 390-395.
Tsounis, N., & Steedman, I. (2021). A New Method for Measuring Total Factor Productivity Growth Based on the Full Industry Equilibrium Approach: The Case of the Greek Economy. Economies, 9(3), 114.‌
United Nations. 2017. The Sustainable developmment goals report. New York.
Wang, J., Zhang, Q., & Li, Q. (2020). R&D Investment and Total Factor Productivity: An Empirical Study of the Listed Companies in the Coastal Regions of China. Journal of Coastal Research, 106(SI): 13-16.‌
West, M. A. (2002). Sparkling fountains or stagnant ponds: An integrative model of creativity and innovation implementation in work groups. Applied Psychology, 51(3), 355-387.
World Bank. (2020). Worldwide Governance Indicators. Retrieved from http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/.
Yamamura, E. & Shin, I. (2012). Heterogeneity, trust, human capital and productivity growth: Decomposition analysis. Journal of Economics and Econometrics, 55(2), 51-77.
Zhatkanbaeva, A., Zhatkanbaeva, J., & Zhatkanbaev, E. (2012). The impact of globalization on “brain drain” in developing countries. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47(2012), 1490-1494.
Zhou, Y. & Ji, Y. (2022). Trade policy uncertainty, innovation and total factor productivity. Sustainability,14(1): 266. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010266