the Effect of Institutional Factors and Economic Growth on Poverty: Spatial Econometric Approach in Selected Asian Countries

Authors
Abstract
Introduction

Poverty has become one of the major global challenges faced by most Asian countries. Although they have been able to achieve technology and increase productivity in the fields of production in recent decades, a high percentage of their society still lives in poverty. The current concern about the increase in chronic poverty in many countries of the developing world requires a deeper understanding not only of the number of poor people, but also of the nature of poverty. This issue has a widespread and devastating impact on the lives of millions of people around the world and is important because its effects go beyond the economic sphere and extend to the social, political and cultural spheres. Poverty reduction is one of the fundamental economic and social challenges in global societies. Therefore, it is very important to examine the factors affecting poverty reduction One of the ways to reduce poverty is the existence of institutional foundations and institutions. Since the second half of the twentieth century, numerous studies have been conducted on the role of institutional and political approaches in poverty reduction. According to these studies, the existence of strong institutions and institutions attracts investment, improves technology and employment, and consequently increases production and economic growth. Therefore, the existence of institutions is the main factor in the growth and development of countries. The existence of institutions and institutions can explain the differences in welfare, growth and development and economic well-being between countries. By creating a stable structure in the economy and society, institutions reduce risk and uncertainty, and thus reduce transaction costs. In short, understanding the interaction between institutional factors, spatial dynamics and poverty reduction is essential for designing effective policies and interventions. The aim of this study is to answer the question of how institutional factors and economic growth can reduce poverty in selected Asian countries?



Method

In this research, the research method is of the spatial analytical and econometric type. The data of this study were collected from the World Bank and the Macro Trends website. In estimating the spatial panel data model, it is necessary to mention a few points. First, the spatial effects in the calculations are factors that are related to the location of the variables. The first factor is the spatial dependence or autocorrelation between the observations of the sample data at different points and the second factor is the spatial structure or heterogeneity created by the model relations for moving on the plane. The coordinates change with the sample data. To detect the spatiality of the data, it is necessary to perform spatial detection tests. In this research, a weight matrix was formed for countries that have geographical connections. The weight matrix is ​​of the adjacency type. The adjacency or neighborhood matrix was formed for the 15 countries studied. In this way, the value of one is considered for neighboring or neighboring countries and the value of zero for non-adjacent countries. Therefore, the adjacency matrix is ​​a symmetric 15x15 matrix with a main diameter of zero and elements outside the main diameter of zero and one. Stata software is used to estimate the model. In panel data with spatial characteristics, fixed and random effects can be considered for the model and the best model was selected from SAR, SDM, SAC, SEM and GSPRE models using the spatial Hausman test, of which the spatial autocorrelation (SAC) model was selected.

Conclusion

Based on the spatial effect of the disturbance components or dependent variables, the results of the spatial autocorrelation model (SAC) show that economic growth and the quality of institutional factors have a positive effect on poverty reduction. Also, increasing domestic investment also helps to reduce poverty. The spatial effects of poverty show that increasing poverty in a country can also cause poverty in neighboring countries. In general, economic growth can increase welfare and create new opportunities. Policies that support economic growth, such as financial development and economic stability, provide a favorable environment for poor households to increase their production and income. The research results show that institutional development and better quality of institutions (such as corruption control, government stability and democracy) have a positive effect on poverty reduction. Better institutional quality improves resource distribution and poverty reduction in the long run. Strong and reliable institutions can increase investment attraction and facilitate international trade. It also confirms the positive effect of domestic investment on poverty reduction. Increased investment increases production, income and welfare and reduces unemployment. Spillover effects of domestic investment can facilitate the transfer of knowledge and technology.
Keywords

• Acemoglu, D. Johnson, S. & Robinson, J.A. (2005). Institutions as a fundamental cause of long-run growth. Handbook of economic growth, 1, 385-472. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0684(05)01006-3.
• Adams Jr, R. H. (2004). Economic growth, inequality and poverty: estimating the growth elasticity of poverty. World development, 32(12), 1989-2014...https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.08.006
• Appiah-Otoo, I. Chen, X. Song, N. & Dumor, K. (2022). Financial development, institutional improvement, poverty reduction: The multiple challenges in West Africa. Journal of Policy Modeling, 44(6), 1296-1312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2022.11.002.
• Asian Development Bank. (2021). Key Indicators for Asia and the Pacific 2021
• Askari, Bint Al-Hadi, and Shafi'i Kakhki, Maryam. (2015). Business potential of Eco :union:: Application of dynamic space with consideration of space overflow management. Regional Economics and Development (Knowledge and Development), 23(11), 167-197. SID https://sid.ir/paper/212869/fa
• Asongu, S. A. & Eita, J. H. (2023). The Conditional Influence of Poverty, Inequality, and Severity of Poverty on Economic Growth in Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of AppliedSocialScience, 17(3),372384. https://doi.org/10.1177/19367244231171821.
• Ayubi, Shabir Ahmad (2021). The relationship between institutional quality and economic growth in Afghanistan. Masters. University of Sistan and Baluchestan. (In Persian).
• Behnejad, Saeeda (2017). The role of institutional conditions in the impact of economic growth on poverty and income inequality. Masters. Mashhad Ferdowsi University. ).In Persian(.
• Britannica,T.(2023).EditorsofEncyclopaediapovertyEncyclopediaBritannica.https://www.britannica.com/topic/poverty.
• Carter.P.(2021). Investment and poverty reduction.British International Investment (bii.co.uk)
• Chen, S., & Ravallion, M. (2010). The developing world is poorer than we thought, but no less successful in the fight against poverty. The Quarterly JournalofEconomics,125(4),15771625.https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2010.125.4.1577.
• Chenery, H. Ahluwalia, M. Bell, C. Duloy, J. Jolly, R. (1974). Redistribution with growth: policies to improve income distribution in developing countries. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Chong, A., & Calderon, C. (2000). Institutional quality and income distribution. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 48(4), 761-786.
• Chong, A., & Gradstein, M. (2007). Inequality and institutions. The review of Economics and Statistics, 89(3),465.https://doi.org/10.1162/rest.89.3.454
• Commons, J. R. (1931). Institutional economics. The American economic review, 648-657.
• Daniil Filipenco (2022). How does poverty impact modern society. How does poverty impact modern society DevelopmentAid.
• Datt, G. Ravallion, M. (1992). Growth and distribution components of changes in poverty: a decomposi-tion to Brasil and India in the 1980s, Journal of Development Economics 38(2): 275–295.
• Dollar, D. & Kraay, A. (2000). Property rights, political rights, and the development of poor countries. Paper prepared for Economic history association meetings, Los Angeles, September.
• Dollar, D.& Kray, A. (2001). Trade, Growth, and Poverty. World Bank Policy Res. Working Paper: (2615). doi: 10.9734/SAJSSE/2019/v3i330106.
• Dong, Y., Jin, G., Deng, X., & Wu, F. (2021). Multidimensionalmeasurement of poverty and its Spatio-temporal dynamics in china from the perspective of development geography. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 31(1), 130–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-021-1836-x
• EkParivartan,(2021).HowDoesPoverty Affect Economic Growth.
• Erlando, A. Riyanto, F. D. & Masakazu, S. (2020). Financial inclusion, economic growth, and poverty alleviation: evidence from eastern Indonesia. Heliyon, 6(10), e05235. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05235.
• Gidigbi, M. O. (2023). Assessing the impact of poverty alleviation programs on poverty reduction in Nigeria: Selected programs. Poverty & Public Policy. https://doi.org/10.1002/pop4.358.
• Gonzalo Gómez-Bengoechea, Olga Moreno-de-Tejada,(2022),Institutional quality and the financial inclusion-poverty alleviation link: Empirical evidence across countries, Borsa Istanbul Review,Volume 22, Issue 1, ,Pages 179-188,ISSN 2214-8450, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2021.03.006.
• Hamid Kahrami, (2018). Investigating the role of institutional quality in the effect of economic sanctions on the poverty gap in Iran, Master's thesis, Supervisor: Karim Islamluian, Shiraz University - Faculty of Economics, Management and Social Sciences. (In Persian).
• HDR. (2003). Human Development Report. Millenium Development Goals: A compact among nations to end human poverty. UNDP, New York: Oxford University Press.
• Hodgson Geoffrey M. (2006) What Are Institution? Journal of Economic issues, Vol. XL No. 1 March 2006
• Hodgson, G.M. (2006). What Are Institutions. J. Economic issues, xl(1):Pp 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2006.11506879
• Jones, E. L. (1981). The European miracle: Environments, economies and geopolitics in the history of Europe and Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Kakwani, K. (1993). Poverty and economic growth with application to Cote D’Ivoire, Review of Income and Wealth 39(2): 121–139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.1993.tb00443.x.
• Keefer, P., & Knack, S. (1997). Why don't poor countries catch up? A cross‐national test of an institutional explanation. Economic inquiry, 35(3), 590-602.
• Keho, Y. (2012). Le rôle desfacteursinstitutionnels dansle développement financier et économique des pays de l’UEMOA. Revue Economique et Monétaire, 12.
• Keho, Y. (2017). Financial development and poverty reduction: Evidence from selected African countries. International Journal of Financial Research, 8, 90–98. DOI: 10.5430/ijfr.v8n4p90
• Knack, S. & Keefer, P. (1997). Why don’t poor countries catch up A cross national test of an institutional explanation. Economic Inquiry, 35, 590–602.
• Kouadio, H. K. & Gakpa, L. L. (2021). Do economic growth and institutional quality reduce poverty and inequality in West Africa? Journal of Policy Modeling, 44(1), 41-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2021.09.010.
• Labony, S. A., Haque, M. S., Rahman, F., Shahabuddin, A. M., & Sultana, T. (2024). THE FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENT, INSTITUTIONS, AND POVERTY REDUCTION: EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM SOUTH ASIAN COUNTRIES. Bangladesh Journal of Multidisciplinary Scientific Research, 9(1), 32-41.
• Liu, M., Hu, S., Ge, Y., Heuvelink, G. B., Ren, Z., & Huang, X. (2021). Using multiple linear regression and random forests to identify spatial poverty determinants in rural China. Spatial Statistics, 42, 100461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spasta.2020.100461.
• Luo, X., Wan, Q., Jin, G. et al (2021). Fluctuation and Spillover: Poverty Reduction Effect of Rural Public Expenditure Scale Based on Spatial Poverty. Appl. Spatial Analysis 14, 247–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12061-020-09356-1.
• Mashaikh, Shahnaz, & Pourfakhrian, Parvin. (1401). Investigating the relationship between profit management and the composition of the board of directors with profit continuity in companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange. Journal of Financial Accounting Research, 14(4), 137-158. doi: 10.22108/far.2023.137545.1967
• Milli Lake, Rachael S Pierotti, Arthur Alik-Lagrange, Resilience, Vulnerability, and Social Isolation: Barriers to Poverty Reduction in War, International Studies Quarterly, Volume 67, Issue 4, December 2023, sqad075, https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqad075.
• Ndzembanteh, A.N., Fonchamnyo, D.C. & Ngangnchi, F.H. Modeling the role of institutions on poverty and environmental sustainability: a panel analysis for British and French ex-colonies in Africa. SN Bus Econ 4, 25 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43546-024.
• Niaz Asadullah, Antonio Savoia, (2018)Poverty reduction during 1990–2013: Did millennium development goals adoption and state capacity matter?,World Development,Volume 105 ,Pages 70-82,ISSN 0305-750X,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.12.010.
• North, D. C. (1981). Structure and change in economic history. Norton & Co.
• North, D. C. (1990). Institutions and economic growth: An historical introduction. World development, 17(9), 1319-1332. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(89)90075-2.
• Olaoye, O. O. (2022). Interrogating sub‐Saharan Africa's high economic growth rate and low poverty reduction rate: A poverty paradox Journal of Public Affairs, e2851. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2851.
• Perotti, R. (1996). “Growth, Income Distribution and Democracy: What the Data Say”, Journal of Economic Growth, 1(2):149–187
• Person, T. Tabellini, G.(1994). Is inequality harmful for growth? American Economic Review 84(3): 600–621.
• Qin, Gao , ,Alex Jingwei(2022), Poverty alleviation in Asia: future directions in measurement, monitoring, and impact evaluation, Journal of Asian Public Policy ,N1 - doi: 10.1080/17516234.2021.2014627.
• Ravallion, M. & Chen, S. (2003). Measuring pro-poor growth. Economic Letters, 78(1), 93–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1765(02)00205-7.
• Ravallion, M. & Chen, S. (2007). China’s (uneven) progress against poverty. Journal of Development Economics, 82, 1–42.
• Ravallion, M. (1998). “Does Aggregation Hide the Harmful Effects of InequalityonGrowth?,EconomicLetters,61:73.77.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1765(98)00139-6.
• Rodrik, D. (2000). Croissance ou lutte contre la pauvreté. Un débat futile. Finances & Développement, 37(4), 8–9.
• Rodrik, D. (2004). Industrial policy for the twenty-first century. Available at SSRN 666808.
• Rodrik, D. (2007). Growth building jobs and prosperity in developing countries. Departement for International Development, 1-25.
• Saidi, Y., Labidi, M.A. & Ochi, A. Economic Growth and Extreme Poverty in Sub-Saharan African Countries: Non-Linearity and Governance Threshold Effect. J Knowl Econ (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01421-7.
• Sawadogo, R. & Semedo, G. (2021). Financial inclusion, income inequality, and institutions in sub-Saharan Africa: Identifying cross-country inequality regimes. International Economics, 167, 15-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inteco.2021.05.002.
• Sirén, S. (2024). When growth is not enough: Do government transfers moderate the effect of economic growth on absolute and relative child poverty? Global Social Policy, 24(1), 46-78. https://doi.org/10.1177/14680181231205376.
• Škare, M. & Pržiklas Družeta, R. (2016). Poverty and economic growth: a review. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 22(1), 156-175. https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2015.1125965.
• Stiglitz, E. J. (2011). Strategies for African development. In Good growth and governance in Africa: Rethinking devel orpiment strategies. Oxford: Unive. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2013.09.049.
• Tebaldi, E., & Mohan, R. (2010). Institutions and poverty. The journal of development studies, 46(6), 10471066.https://doi.org/10.1080/00220380903012730
• The Editors of Encyclopedia Britannica. (2023). Poverty. In Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved from https://www.britannica.com/topic/poverty
• Uddin, G. S. Shahbaz, M. Arouri, M. & Teulon, F. (2014). Financial development and poverty reduction nexus: a cointegration and causality analysis in Bangladesh. Economic Modelling, 36, 405–412.
• Wang, Z., Ma, D., Zhang, J., Wang, Y., & Sun, D. (2023). Does urbanization have spatial spillover effect on poverty reduction: empirical evidence from rural China. EconomicResearch-EkonomskaIstraživanja, 36(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2023.2167730.
• World Bank (2020). Poverty and Shared Prosperity 2020: Reversals of Fortune. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi: 10.1596/978-1-4648-1602-4. License: Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 0/3 IGO.
• World Bank. (2020). Poverty and Shared Prosperity 2020: Reversals of Fortune.
• World Bank. (2002). The World Bank Annual Report.
• World Bank. (2023). The World Bank Annual Report.
• World Bank. (2024). The World Bank Annual Report
• Zhang, R. & Naceur, S. B. (2019). Financial development, inequality, and poverty: Some international evidence. International Review of Economics & Finance, 61, 1-16.